The Geoscience aspects Port Alma Peat Bog area's #qldpol #auspol #heritage #Geoscience #Paleontology #geology
F/Book Australia an Ancient Past
video on Aspects of Port Alma
Video link to Geology, Geography and drilling results Port Alma
https://youtu.be/lhsjEU3HZ6k
These peat bogs jut down in few parallel strips into Casuarina creek they also exist in across the mud flats and road, some shale area's Inkerman creek a couple miles away up creek from the parallel maffic / magnet faults that Tom rich told me were Devonian, a compass put down on them makes north swing around to SSW. maybe the same anomaly that made Capt Cook have problems with at aptly named Magnetic Island In literature I have read it says that at the mouth of the Ross river and Burdiken river are stumps of the ancient tree Glosspertis
Unknown species maybe early marsupial
Unknown extinct species
Been told by Paleontologist CQ Uni Townsville a Mr Henderson that these trees at the three meter down tidal mark are freshwater tree's now think about it these are fresh some 40 ks from any un-salted main land ground by road. hardly be Holocene for a start.
The map above show I am in line with ancient ground from faults Gladstone way
The tropic of Capricorn travels straight through the area I have been searching
The dark area on the map between the yellow n red area is the maffic faults this is a radiometric map which shows the ground a meter or 2 under as that all it can read is maffic and must be a physically joined entity.
The foot note says surface but the Qld Geologist says over a kilometre below mud .
This pink area is the shale area they have salt evaporation pans on being mud to 200 and 100 ft where coal is would let the water disappear .
This is also a Satellite map which shows the magnetic waves of the rock under the ground. The footnote on this diagram says only surface, so why does everyone believe the Qld Geologist? These maps alone tell a knowledgeable geologist that the peat gravels and layers of oil to Lignite at 200 ft/100ft underneath have to be ancient as this magma underground is between 450 and 250 million years as it must be fused to give this signature. Impossible to have Tertiary under fused ancient rock.
One of the Magnetic/Maffic faults that jut down int Inkerman creek though there are no fossils around the area specifically, there is limestone marl pieces and the black fresh water tree at the low tide level. my theory is they could not survive the wave intensity and only survived as fossils on the waves of peat much father away as the first fault waves would have to grow bigger and calmer as the distance grew.
Some people have told me this is a spore pod from an ancient tree
.jpg)
Brachipods and an ancient oyster Gryaphidia one on top left someone from museum say tortoise looks like crinoid to me and people on F/B. Left is the Gogo Placoderm plate <not a giant catfish Ha haha>
These all have legs or feeder tubes was told by museum an anomaly of a stick well this many anomalies is pretty unusual especially when some can be seen as tubes.
This was supposed to be tortoise on can clearly see it is segmented sections.
These are magnification 10x from some other shale
The segmented sections can be found on the tredino worms from the freshwater trees. Top tredino worm not only super hard shale from deep burial looks as though squashed by some tectonic activity and bottom one also with a tectonic slick and slide caused by another rock sliding past cutting and sealing, there has been no tectonic activity down there for some 250 million years at least
All above are artifacts found at the peat bog areas, a Luke Godwin Archaeologist for the aboriginal people of Rockhampton told me so when he came looking at sites I found at Mt Morgan. Seeing this area is around 30-40 ks from normal land I could not imaging aboriginals making many journeys down here in recent Holocene time having lack of fresh water. maybe and maps say it was land during the Tertiary time
Ancient crinoidal matter in one of the artifact rocks I broke not knowing it was an artifact one has a habit of hitting some rocks with a miners pick it is what people who make discoveries do.
I have these Bryzoans on a supposedly modern day fossil according to the Museum, but the person never turn these lobsters over and see some had nine segments like a mantis shrimp not a mud lobster
These segmented part of the lobster must have been a weak point also as not many can be found like this but a lot with the spiky telson place up between the claws, Now the most difficult thing in the world to do is to tell some paleontologist he was wrong it is like telling the Vatican they has pedo cardinals, nothing is ever taken noticed or done, a just don't want to know attitude
Granite type lobster nodule from the shale area near Inkerman creek mudstone from near the river just short of the shale, The Qld Geologist told me the granite items were a ancient brachipod Enchinsolia.
Enchinsolia bracipodia from the shale area,
Orthosclase ballstone left from shale area and mudstone ones only found near the peat area
Orthoslase brachipodia from the creek peat area .
I have the fresh water tree that goes through what is supposed to be a salt water lobster,
This lady in her way says my work is right so eat your heart out Qld Museum
The letter from Professor Henderson who said the tree's were fresh water species.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVsh0V3u0Ok&feature=youtu.be
Videos of fossils
google.com.au/books?id=7DgqCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT1&lpg=PT1&dq=Australia+an+ancient+past+marcus+knight&source=bl&ots=5X1eATObKQ&sig=ZUI0A23YvqnKvYQ-Yc-dsut1OtY&hl=en&sa=X#v=onepage&q=Australia%20an%20ancient%20past%20marcus%20knight&f=true … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …… … …, my ebook
Summing up one could say that by rules of Geoscience only older items can be found under old strata and one is sure the peat areas originate from under the maffic area as they are recorded in the drilling reports. One has been denied proper assessments by Politicians and Museum people alike since they lost some fossil 18 years ago and this refusal has meant the loss of much valuable heritage that could have been useful to Australia as a whole as if this is tertiary or even more ancient like up to 450 million years this could reclassify many other sites these fossils occur from ordinary old useless Holocene to useful Paleozoic
Video description of 30 ft fish.
We have admission that they are possibly Tertiary and not just Holocene as the Museum has told me all my fossils and sub-fossils are. The fact remains that there are megafauna and mega stone fish vertebra and Plate, obviously the stone one can be assumed to be older than the bone ones especially of similar size
Marsupial Vertebra and a jaw and teeth that are an older version of maybe Bunyip type animal Giant sheep the neck vertebra the middle top a Queensland Museum idea , Lady at collections at south Australian museum says ancient camel neck bone probably 40 million years or even older under a cetacean D Pickering told me whale similar to Tertiary fossils they were finding at an excavation on land at the oil shale only some maybe ten miles away over the mangroves along the ruler in the map above, some super size fish and a couple ordinary modern day smaller fish no peat stains on them. Bottom
Many different species of marsupials well preserved i say from a mixture of Peat and soluble Silicone in the fresh water under Port Alma, modern day oceans or some brines don't have this element It is noted in the 1920 Dunstan drilling results when drilling for bribes to make salt the water was found to be fresher than the seawater a possible signature of an ancient Ocean.
this link explains a bit about ancient Oceans being high silicon
A paleontologist dig the diagrams on the photos to explain to me what parts of the giant bird he said they were the top he couldn't say if bird or Petrasaur, It was later lost by person of the Qld Uni when handed to them to examine.
Above is a selection of sub fossils some of species not alive today
Thee large ones are so stone the Museum director Paleontologist D Pickering of Melbourne told me this process would have taken millions of year to happen and possibly 65 million year, the whole 8 of them laughed when I told them the Museum here in Queensland told me 30foot Bream or mackerel. and later was told Grouper and Giant catfish. Now the Plate I didn't have when I visited the Melbourne Museum and later handed my fossils case to a J Stilwel of Monash uni, Well P Rich of the Monash Uni who had also inspected my fossils and sub fossils but would not comment because of legal reasons told me to show the Plate to an ancient fish expert, Now I am sure she would not damage her credibility as an expert in getting me to show him a catfish plate.
Comparison of recent catfish or maybe Tertiary catfish as it is really large compared to modern day ones I have caught to the Go-Go shark plate which Pat Rich's book says it is.
Been told by Paleontologist CQ Uni Townsville a Mr Henderson that these trees at the three meter down tidal mark are freshwater tree's now think about it these are fresh some 40 ks from any un-salted main land ground by road. hardly be Holocene for a start.
Recently I was told by the Qld Geologist that the signatures of the magnetism is from reading from under a kilometre of mud, but the radio active readings say only 20-30 cm under the mud for this readings and it shows down the same area a mass of rock is under the mud as mud can not be radioactive and most radio active readings are given by a fused layer of rock probably linked to a deeper mass the faulted rock in area black.
This is also a Satellite map which shows the magnetic waves of the rock under the ground. The footnote on this diagram says only surface, so why does everyone believe the Qld Geologist? These maps alone tell a knowledgeable geologist that the peat gravels and layers of oil to Lignite at 200 ft/100ft underneath have to be ancient as this magma underground is between 450 and 250 million years as it must be fused to give this signature. Impossible to have Tertiary under fused ancient rock.
This email is an answer i got when I showed him the underneath bryzoans on the serrated edge shell I only found five of and all at once one expedition, Like there are numerous bivalves there but none with so intricate zigzag design and the book Pat Rich sent me with my fossils back had this page marked
Also found in other books written by Australians who say it is 250 million years old. Eurydesma megadesma
These are stone and also found at different times in the peat, it was not unusual not to find a couple of these each journey. I say Tertiary of the mega fauna times
Some people have told me this is a spore pod from an ancient tree
The very small crystal green rock left is of a piece of the fault the other was excavated many miles away back towards Bajool where along the road they had to blow rock to put power poles down 3 meters has very large crystals of pyrites among the green basalt
On the left this time i have the green basalt connected to Limestone part of crinoidal mass also excavated and right fault rock close to the maffic faults excavated from powerline construction
\
I say large marker-stone from an ancient race of Aboriginals excavated at numerous pole sites, some comes in pink and there
Another version of crinoidal rock from area probably some sort of aboriginal chopping stone as all these rocks have been broken of the reef of rock which shows up red or yellow on the radiometric map.
lower it to me is a brachipod cast fossil and on it feeder tube is the smallest crab maybe in the world. This would make every other tiny crab fossil down there the same age .
.jpg)
These all have legs or feeder tubes was told by museum an anomaly of a stick well this many anomalies is pretty unusual especially when some can be seen as tubes.
Bruce Runnegar before he went to work for NASA told these bivalves that stand like skittles are Eurydesma megadesmus of the Permian .
Some have tubes many not but that might mean the tube piece was fragile and was broke of by tidal action of when it was fossilized. Head of modern day fossils Paleontologist R Wurst of Townsville CQ Uni could not name them as a modern-day species
These are magnification 10x from some other shale
All above are artifacts found at the peat bog areas, a Luke Godwin Archaeologist for the aboriginal people of Rockhampton told me so when he came looking at sites I found at Mt Morgan. Seeing this area is around 30-40 ks from normal land I could not imaging aboriginals making many journeys down here in recent Holocene time having lack of fresh water. maybe and maps say it was land during the Tertiary time
I have these Bryzoans on a supposedly modern day fossil according to the Museum, but the person never turn these lobsters over and see some had nine segments like a mantis shrimp not a mud lobster
These segmented part of the lobster must have been a weak point also as not many can be found like this but a lot with the spiky telson place up between the claws, Now the most difficult thing in the world to do is to tell some paleontologist he was wrong it is like telling the Vatican they has pedo cardinals, nothing is ever taken noticed or done, a just don't want to know attitude
Granite type lobster nodule from the shale area near Inkerman creek mudstone from near the river just short of the shale, The Qld Geologist told me the granite items were a ancient brachipod Enchinsolia.
Drilling results from 1920s
The letter from Professor Henderson who said the tree's were fresh water species.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVsh0V3u0Ok&feature=youtu.be
Videos of fossils
google.com.au/books?id=7DgqCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT1&lpg=PT1&dq=Australia+an+ancient+past+marcus+knight&source=bl&ots=5X1eATObKQ&sig=ZUI0A23YvqnKvYQ-Yc-dsut1OtY&hl=en&sa=X#v=onepage&q=Australia%20an%20ancient%20past%20marcus%20knight&f=true … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …… … …, my ebook
Summing up one could say that by rules of Geoscience only older items can be found under old strata and one is sure the peat areas originate from under the maffic area as they are recorded in the drilling reports. One has been denied proper assessments by Politicians and Museum people alike since they lost some fossil 18 years ago and this refusal has meant the loss of much valuable heritage that could have been useful to Australia as a whole as if this is tertiary or even more ancient like up to 450 million years this could reclassify many other sites these fossils occur from ordinary old useless Holocene to useful Paleozoic
부산콜걸
ReplyDelete부산콜걸
철원콜걸
울산콜걸
대전콜걸
화천콜걸
광주콜걸
광주콜걸